anyone used vision-v or similar.

[jc jason]

Keep looking at vision -v to add to water, but does it really work , should i be adding to pure water.

If you use this let me know what you think.

Thanks

 

["H"]

Keep looking at vision -v to add to water, but does it really work , should i be adding to pure water.If you use this let me know what you think.

Thanks

It's already been discussed on here a while back.

Try this link, I googled it, and have a read. /emoticons/smile.png

How may of you have tried vision yet

 

[jc jason]

so you dont use it then ?

 

[Natty1972]

PURE WATER IS KING

 

[A.K WINDOWS]

I used added sparkle before what they said to add didn't do anything I doubled the dose and it was OK but nothing to write home about end of day I do 1st cleans and one offs with virosol type solution then just use pure it works and that's that.

A quick pretty spray with any degrease will work better than this added ****

 

[Pjj]

Why anyone would spend thousands of pounds on filtration only to add products like this to there water just amazes me , most who have used it then stop using it admit it's a placebo effect , good quality pure water is all that's needed on a normal clean , if very contaminated use virosol for the first clean and finish with pure and it will gleam , there are a lot of people who use very poor water with high tds readings this is why they get poor results use ro water with a reading of zero and you will have a far better finish than people who are using all these additives they are a waist of money and not needed

 

[Iron Giant]

I have used Vision for well over a year now currently using V2 and I have to say I wouldn't stop using.

Sent using the Window Cleaning Forums mobile app

 

[jc jason]

thanks all, i will stick to pure water.

 

[Poles Apart]

This Forum has more Repeats than ITV 3 but I don't use the stuff seems like a Placebo to me I use Pure Water Hydrophylic or Phobic I don't get complaints so it ain't broke.........:thumbsdown:

 

[Marko067]

Because of all the claims made about them, I tried both V1 and V2. For me, neither lived up to the claims made about them. You kid yourself that they are doing something till it runs out and then notice that there's no perceivable difference to the finish. Both were a complete waste of money as far as I'm concerned.

To be fair, I will say that I work inland away from the coast. Whether it has a perceivable effect there, I can't say. It seems from reading on here though, that hot water works best in those areas

 

[A.K WINDOWS]

Like said before if your cleaning with 0.00ppm you don't need it ....probably why these lot cleaning in double ppm think it's good or needed who knows.

 

[adamangler]

Tried the original just got a load of bubbles. Additives are just not needed imo. First clean with a cleaner of your choice then purevealed is plenty on its own for maintenance cleans.

 

[kevinc250]

Tried the original just got a load of bubbles. Additives are just not needed imo. First clean with a cleaner of your choice then purevealed is plenty on its own for maintenance cleans.

a lot of intresting answers about additives,it seems most think its a placebo effect or just plainly doesn't give the same result as "pure" does

i may try that v2 one day

 

[Chelmsford Cleaning - Sam]

I tried vision after being recommended by a friend of mine.

I used the minimum dose,, measured carefully with the pipette.

I got quite a few complaints,, when I called round to see what was wrong the windows had sticky, hollow spots on them from the bubbles made by the vision.

Recleaned with pure water and all fine. Got the bottle sitting in my van, won't use it again. While using it your talking yourself into believing your cleaning faster and better. Checking the figures it made no difference. You'd just justifying the money. Especially bad when you get unhappy customers and recleans.