For those who aren’t aware who I am I make the Aerial brushes under the Tecbuk name.
I have just been on the ACS Forum, noticed a thread about ‘Tecbuk Brushes’ so had a look, and was shocked to see most of the replies were by forum moderators and were rude, biased, untrue and insulting
I was under the impression that forum moderators were there to regulate posts and not offer biased opinions, regarding the ACS forum this is clearly not the case, although I do credit the intelligence of most of its members.
I welcome all constructive criticism as this goes towards product development; biased opinionated individuals with little knowledge of the subject never help anyone.
My response to that thread is below; it did respond in haste –
“ASC Cleaning Forum – impartial advice from cleaning professionals” (at its best)
Your Insults aside, you are en***led to your own opinion, just as much as I am.
If you think a brush such as Gardiner’s extreme with approximately 9,600 monofilaments cleans faster then the Aerial brush with approximately 42,500 monofilaments that is your opinion.
The subject of brushes is vast and with such biased views it doesn’t warrant going into this.
Still, sincerely best regards and apologies for the original poster about the brushes assuming your comments are genuine - I am behind with brush orders and have been since the start of the year, I can assure you are not the only one who is a little put out by this.
Richard Sorrell
(By the way the extreme monofilament is about 50% bigger diameter, the equivalent of 14,400 filaments than the Red Aerial brush, this would give it only a third of the cleaning ability and not over 4 times, and in test it does take 3 brush strokes to achieve the same result as one Aerial brush stroke)
I have just been on the ACS Forum, noticed a thread about ‘Tecbuk Brushes’ so had a look, and was shocked to see most of the replies were by forum moderators and were rude, biased, untrue and insulting
I was under the impression that forum moderators were there to regulate posts and not offer biased opinions, regarding the ACS forum this is clearly not the case, although I do credit the intelligence of most of its members.
I welcome all constructive criticism as this goes towards product development; biased opinionated individuals with little knowledge of the subject never help anyone.
My response to that thread is below; it did respond in haste –
“ASC Cleaning Forum – impartial advice from cleaning professionals” (at its best)
Your Insults aside, you are en***led to your own opinion, just as much as I am.
If you think a brush such as Gardiner’s extreme with approximately 9,600 monofilaments cleans faster then the Aerial brush with approximately 42,500 monofilaments that is your opinion.
The subject of brushes is vast and with such biased views it doesn’t warrant going into this.
Still, sincerely best regards and apologies for the original poster about the brushes assuming your comments are genuine - I am behind with brush orders and have been since the start of the year, I can assure you are not the only one who is a little put out by this.
Richard Sorrell
(By the way the extreme monofilament is about 50% bigger diameter, the equivalent of 14,400 filaments than the Red Aerial brush, this would give it only a third of the cleaning ability and not over 4 times, and in test it does take 3 brush strokes to achieve the same result as one Aerial brush stroke)