adamangler
Wakefield Window Warrior
- Messages
- 4,271
- Location
- Wakefield
Hmmm so.
I had a 150 gpd R.O I have made the pure/waste ratio 1:1 as per @spruce advice, using a tap to replace the restrictor.
Now I have upgraded it to a 450 gpd with two extra housings. I have set it up it series with the waste from one going through the next as couldn't find much info online on how to set it up.
After doing so I had to restrict the waste/pure back to 1:1 with the tap.
Just wondering if I was supposed to set them up in parallel and if so what effect would it have in terms of the speed pure is produced Vs the amount of water water Vs lifespan of membranes?
I think I read @Dave B mention something to do with this but can't find it
Running 1:1 ratio I'm producing 700ml of pure a minute or 42l an hour, this seems quite low, I think parallel will produce more pure? Speed isn't that much of an issue I'd rather it be more cost efficient in terms of waste and membrane life and also efficency for the resin
Any help would be good
I had a 150 gpd R.O I have made the pure/waste ratio 1:1 as per @spruce advice, using a tap to replace the restrictor.
Now I have upgraded it to a 450 gpd with two extra housings. I have set it up it series with the waste from one going through the next as couldn't find much info online on how to set it up.
After doing so I had to restrict the waste/pure back to 1:1 with the tap.
Just wondering if I was supposed to set them up in parallel and if so what effect would it have in terms of the speed pure is produced Vs the amount of water water Vs lifespan of membranes?
I think I read @Dave B mention something to do with this but can't find it
Running 1:1 ratio I'm producing 700ml of pure a minute or 42l an hour, this seems quite low, I think parallel will produce more pure? Speed isn't that much of an issue I'd rather it be more cost efficient in terms of waste and membrane life and also efficency for the resin
Any help would be good