Talking to the owner of the acs forum, a thread about brushes - he thinks 80g of extra weight a brush has over another is the only thing that makes a pole heavy and hard work to use.
According to his way of thinking – it works this way - if for example you use a 25ft then you use a 75ft pole those extra 80g the brush has are to blame for the extra difficulty the pole is to handle and the reason why it’s just so tiring to use
Maybe someone can explain the extra weight of 50 feet of pole - or even just the extra 50 feet of pole hose and water which can weigh easily over 1,000 grams above and over the already extended first 25 feet, (it’s the brushes fault, I hear him cry out)
Every couple of metres you extend a carbon fibre wfp you can easily add the equivalent weight of another brush. I’m sure most would agree extend a pole without a brush and you start to notice it gets heavier to handle the further you extend
Richard
(Just joking Nat, I think stubborn)
According to his way of thinking – it works this way - if for example you use a 25ft then you use a 75ft pole those extra 80g the brush has are to blame for the extra difficulty the pole is to handle and the reason why it’s just so tiring to use
Maybe someone can explain the extra weight of 50 feet of pole - or even just the extra 50 feet of pole hose and water which can weigh easily over 1,000 grams above and over the already extended first 25 feet, (it’s the brushes fault, I hear him cry out)
Every couple of metres you extend a carbon fibre wfp you can easily add the equivalent weight of another brush. I’m sure most would agree extend a pole without a brush and you start to notice it gets heavier to handle the further you extend
Richard
(Just joking Nat, I think stubborn)