Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Makes sense but I still don't quite get why it's a problem the microbore going up the pole, it's not like it's a diameter issue as microbore wouldn't go up first section anyway. Only thing I can think of is extra weight in microbore?The pole hose is connected to the microbore and the pole hose then connects to the tube less set up in the pole , I don’t want microbore going up inside the poles , hope that makes sense .
View attachment 23114
It makes a massive difference to the weight, for a while I had one with microbore all way to the tubeless coupler, and another with pole hose as usual. It was nice having the hose completely seamless, but switching between them was noticeably different. On 3 storey or reaching over a conservatory it's very heavy.Makes sense but I still don't quite get why it's a problem the microbore going up the pole, it's not like it's a diameter issue as microbore wouldn't go up first section anyway. Only thing I can think of is extra weight in microbore?
Just checked and PU pole hose is 34grams per meter and all season 6mm microbore is about 100grams per meter! So that's about 400 -500gms heavier + the extra water!!!! That explains it.....
Cheers @Pjj
When using a pole at 84 feet high the weight of microbore is huge , when using shorter poles at shallow angles it also dramatically increases the effort needed to hold the pole . Pole hose is also more flexible going into the pole microbore is stiffer and again moving the pole at angles takes more effort it’s not impossible to do but anything that makes the pole lighter and easier to use all day is well worth the effort , we use 100 meters if 6 mm microbore ,with 30 meters of pole hose attached si total of 130 meters if the microbore was going up the pole it will shorten your distance you can work at to a small degree as well , on commercial work it can make the difference to having to use a second hose reel or not , so as Tesco say “ every little helps “ ???Makes sense but I still don't quite get why it's a problem the microbore going up the pole, it's not like it's a diameter issue as microbore wouldn't go up first section anyway. Only thing I can think of is extra weight in microbore?
Just checked and PU pole hose is 34grams per meter and all season 6mm microbore is about 100grams per meter! So that's about 400 -500gms heavier + the extra water!!!! That explains it.....
Cheers @Pjj
I can see why you don't have a tap between the reel and pole hose if it might be 30m away! ?...we use 100 metres of 6mm microbore, with 30 metres of pole hose attached a total of 130 metres.
Cheers. Logical when you think of it. Weight is the enemy.When using a pole at 84 feet high the weight of microbore is huge , when using shorter poles at shallow angles it also dramatically increases the effort needed to hold the pole . Pole hose is also more flexible going into the pole microbore is stiffer and again moving the pole at angles takes more effort it’s not impossible to do but anything that makes the pole lighter and easier to use all day is well worth the effort , we use 100 meters if 6 mm microbore ,with 30 meters of pole hose attached si total of 130 meters if the microbore was going up the pole it will shorten your distance you can work at to a small degree as well , on commercial work it can make the difference to having to use a second hose reel or not , so as Tesco say “ every little helps “ ???
I was going to agree with your point about weight being the enemy.Cheers. Logical when you think of it. Weight is the enemy.
Since lockdown my brain is turning to mush....
Wait until you get in your fifties lolCheers. Logical when you think of it. Weight is the enemy.
Since lockdown my brain is turning to mush....
I’ve done this for the last couple of years - best thing I ever did. No more pole hose twisting, kinking or leaking.Makes sense but I still don't quite get why it's a problem the microbore going up the pole, it's not like it's a diameter issue as microbore wouldn't go up first section anyway. Only thing I can think of is extra weight in microbore?
Just checked and PU pole hose is 34grams per meter and all season 6mm microbore is about 100grams per meter! So that's about 400 -500gms heavier + the extra water!!!! That explains it.....
Cheers @Pjj
Have cut right back now weigh 16st 7 ounces well pleased with myself lolProbably hasn't drunk as much beer as you or I though ?
So you really are a lightweight now ?Have cut right back now weigh 16st 7 ounces well pleased with myself lol
I’m a skinny f#%cker now ?So you really are a lightweight now ?
There's already somethingCould you design something that clips onto your hose and then wedges under a car tyre so you can pull your hose around it? Everyones at home these days so I'm constantly having to navigate my hose around the cars
Or is there something already out there?
That's genius, if it works properly.
Those have been around for at least 12 to 15 years. I have 2 left. Not sure where I left the 3rd one. One worked fine, 2 were a bit more difficult to pull the hose around and using the third all together didn't work.That's genius, if it works properly.
Add 20 years to that and you will understand the brain going to mush.Wait until you get in your fifties lol