Welcome to the UK Window Cleaning Forums

Starting or own a window cleaning business? We're a network of window cleaners sharing advice, tips & experience. Rounds for sale & more. Join us today!

Teesside Window cleaning - inquest into the death of one of his employees.

WCF

Help Support WCF:

spruce

The Sprucefather
Premium Member
Messages
9,515
Location
Teesside
Back in 2023, I started a post regarding the death of Andrew Langstaff who was working for Teesside Window Cleaning.

Here is a link to that thread;

https://windowcleaningforums.co.uk/threads/teesside-window-cleaner-passed-away-in-accident.37578/

A few days ago, an inquest into Andrew's death was held in a Middlesbrough court over 2 days.

Here is our local newspaper's report of the proceedings.

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/andrew-langstaff-inquest-billingham-crash-30801868

The newspaper reports that Huran Hussain testified that strapping an IBC tank into the back of a van was common practice. It isn't. He testified that he believed the straps were safe and was not aware of any other methods used to secure the cylinders at the time. He said: "I wish at the time I knew how dangerous they could be." Absolute lies. Many on this and the other forum warned him about this unsafe practice numerous times, but he chose to ignore the advice. Anyone who commented against what he was doing was seen by him as an idiot.

I'm saddened that this situation has led to a window cleaner's death, but glad that this ratchet strapping an IBC tank down has been shown to be an 'inappropriate' way of securing the tank by the crash investigators.

I spoke to one of his ex-employees a few months ago. He has a Transit van with an IBC tank ratchet strapped in the back. I pointed out how dangerous this was. He said this setup was just temporary. I saw his van a couple of days ago and he still has the IBC tank strapped in. I honestly hope the outcome of this inquest makes him and any others sit up and rectify this.

Interestingly, the investigators also stated that the van was being driven erratically just before the crash. There was no indication that there was drink involved, but the comment made was that Google maps was on his phone and that a photo had been accessed during the journey. Was Andrew distracted by his phone?
 
Back in 2023, I started a post regarding the death of Andrew Langstaff who was working for Teesside Window Cleaning.

Here is a link to that thread;

https://windowcleaningforums.co.uk/threads/teesside-window-cleaner-passed-away-in-accident.37578/

A few days ago, an inquest into Andrew's death was held in a Middlesbrough court over 2 days.

Here is our local newspaper's report of the proceedings.

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/andrew-langstaff-inquest-billingham-crash-30801868

The newspaper reports that Huran Hussain testified that strapping an IBC tank into the back of a van was common practice. It isn't. He testified that he believed the straps were safe and was not aware of any other methods used to secure the cylinders at the time. He said: "I wish at the time I knew how dangerous they could be." Absolute lies. Many on this and the other forum warned him about this unsafe practice numerous times, but he chose to ignore the advice. Anyone who commented against what he was doing was seen by him as an idiot.

I'm saddened that this situation has led to a window cleaner's death, but glad that this ratchet strapping an IBC tank down has been shown to be an 'inappropriate' way of securing the tank by the crash investigators.

I spoke to one of his ex-employees a few months ago. He has a Transit van with an IBC tank ratchet strapped in the back. I pointed out how dangerous this was. He said this setup was just temporary. I saw his van a couple of days ago and he still has the IBC tank strapped in. I honestly hope the outcome of this inquest makes him and any others sit up and rectify this.

Interestingly, the investigators also stated that the van was being driven erratically just before the crash. There was no indication that there was drink involved, but the comment made was that Google maps was on his phone and that a photo had been accessed during the journey. Was Andrew distracted by his phone?
Thanks for the update Bruce let’s hope this is now taken more seriously by the ratchet strap brigade please post this on ciu as well ime sure the usual suspects will poo poo it but it’s from an independent body that have published this report and it needs publicising
 
ive looked in a companies van also. a big firm in north east. Big 1000 Water Tank. ratchet straps were something like you would buy in a Boyes store. the guy just shrugged his shoulders, he said it sometimes moves when driving.
Not his van attitude
 
Interesting to read that they state he was a sub-contracted :unsure:

All in all, it's quite sad that mistakes made could have been avoided and this accident could have very well not happened.
Nothing is ever what it seems with Harun. He was driving a Teesside Window Cleaning van and using their equipment. So he was employed, not a subcontractor.

Unfortunately, sometimes things like this make some realize that this isn't the way to go, and they learn from other's mistakes. Then there are some who just carry on; business as usual.
 
Nothing is ever what it seems with Harun. He was driving a Teesside Window Cleaning van and using their equipment. So he was employed, not a subcontractor.

Unfortunately, sometimes things like this make some realize that this isn't the way to go, and they learn from other's mistakes. Then there are some who just carry on; business as usual.
This is just the inquest though. The legalities are another matter once the judge has reached his/her verdict! Then the repercussion's should start. That said, I do wonder why HMRC aren't on this like a ton of bricks.
 
Interesting to read that they state he was a sub-contracted :unsure:

All in all, it's quite sad that mistakes made could have been avoided and this accident could have very well not happened.
Unfortunately some people are purely driven by money. Yes everyone needs it, and everyone wants more, but sometimes money isn't just worth it, especially if you have any principles
 
Has it been revealed what speed the crash was?
Crash tested systems are only up to 30mph aren’t they?
If the crash was above that then would the outcome have been any different regardless of how the tank was fixed in.
I used ratchets for probably 18 years. I’ve now got it bolted in and with ratchets round it. But I’m far from convinced that in the event of a high speed crash I will be protected.
Nor will all the builders with a tonne of bricks sat on the back of the pick up etc.
I do agree with Spuce that the key is driving as safe as you can. Especially when the tank is full.
 
Has it been revealed what speed the crash was?
Crash tested systems are only up to 30mph aren’t they?
If the crash was above that then would the outcome have been any different regardless of how the tank was fixed in.
I used ratchets for probably 18 years. I’ve now got it bolted in and with ratchets round it. But I’m far from convinced that in the event of a high speed crash I will be protected.
Nor will all the builders with a tonne of bricks sat on the back of the pick up etc.
I do agree with Spuce that the key is driving as safe as you can. Especially when the tank is full.
I passed a builder last week he had the rear doors wide open on his transit custom, the van looked on its a-ss with what looked like 2 ton of sand in the back 🙄
 
Back
Top